we don’t need approval from the federal government to stand up for our rights. We need to stand up for them whether they want us to or not!

An important decision faces We the People. Will we continue to stand as a nation built on principle? Or will we float aimlessly in a sea of pragmatism?

If the denial to the federal government of any undelegated power is indeed a truism, then why has that entity repeatedly exercised authority for powers it was never given by the states?

Has anyone ever refused to answer a question from a federal inquisitor on Tenth Amendment grounds? I don’t know, but I’d love to hear it from Roger Clemens…

If Congress oversteps its constitutional bounds in this manner, it is the right and responsibility of the states to overrule Congress and protect the Life, Liberty and Property of state citizens.

Asking, demanding, hoping – that the federal government will limit its own power – just doesn’t work. So why not try something new?

In 1830, when South Carolina politicians were arguing for “nullification” of a federal tariff they viewed as unconstitutional, the elderly James Madison penned a public response.

Maintaining government over the daily concerns of people at the lowest level possible was necessary for self-government to thrive and kingly government to have no place in the future of the United States.

There is no loophole that can allow international interests to trump the U.S. Constitution, but the treaty must be made in pursuance of our Constitution, just as all laws that Congress makes must be in pursuance of the Constitution.

“In the debate over whether to legalize gay marriage, both sides are missing the point. Why should the government be in the business of decreeing who can and cannot be married?”